0.15% and a Chip You Can’t Touch: Thousands of Banks Sue Apple Pay

Apple charges issuers 0.15% per transaction and blocks rivals from the NFC chip. This week thousands of those issuers won the right to sue as a class.

Apple charges U.S. card issuers 0.15% on every credit transaction that runs through Apple Pay, plus a flat sliver on debit. Nobody else in the mobile wallet business gets to charge issuers anything, because on an iPhone nobody else is in the mobile wallet business. That is the whole case, compressed into three decimal places.

0.15%: the fee that started it

Fifteen basis points doesn’t sound like much until you multiply it by the volume flowing through hundreds of millions of iPhones. Banks pay it because they have no alternative — they can’t ship their own tap-to-pay app that reaches the NFC radio the way Apple Pay does. The plaintiffs’ theory is straightforward antitrust: Apple allegedly monopolises the market for “tap-and-pay iOS mobile wallets,” and the fee is the toll it can only collect because the road is closed to everyone else.

Thousands: the class Judge White just certified

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White (Northern District of California) certified a class covering U.S. entities that issued payment cards usable with Apple Pay. That’s the mechanical shift this week. One credit union grumbling about basis points is a nuisance. Thousands of issuers pursuing the claim collectively, sharing discovery and a single liability finding, is a different animal — it changes Apple’s exposure and its appetite to settle. Apple said it will ask the Ninth Circuit to review the class certification, which can stall things for months before anyone argues the actual antitrust merits.

One chip: how the exclusivity actually works

The technical core is the Secure Element — a tamper-resistant chip that stores payment credentials and performs the EMV transaction. The NFC controller talks to a terminal; the Secure Element holds the keys. For years, the code path from an external terminal tap to the Secure Element was reachable by exactly one piece of software: Apple Wallet. Third-party apps got Core NFC for reading tags and, later, some reader use cases, but not card emulation against the Secure Element. No entitlement existed to request it. That’s the padlock the banks are describing.

Zero: what this changes for your MDM stack

If you administer Apple devices, resist the urge to file this under “things I have to react to.” Apple Pay’s Secure Element access isn’t exposed through MDM configuration or Apple Business Manager settings, and no declarative management feature touches it. Wallet digital credentials — mDLs, employee badges, the IDs you provision through PassKit — sit on a separate track from the NFC payment path this lawsuit targets. Don’t conflate them. A verdict against Apple would reshape the App Store entitlement process and issuer economics, not your device baseline.

What happens next

Apple will ask the Ninth Circuit to review the class certification, which can stall things for months. If the class holds and the case eventually forces Apple to open contactless access to U.S. wallets, the real work lands on developers and issuers, not admins — new entitlements to request, new attestation and provisioning flows, new default-wallet selection UI. The chip won’t change. The gate around it might.

Watch the Ninth Circuit. That’s the tell for whether this fight resolves in a settlement or grinds toward the merits.